Velominati Super Prestige: Women’s Ronde van Vlaanderen 2012

Oenone Wood rocks up the Kapelmuur

The Velominati Super-Prestige continues with our second Women’s event of 2012, the Women’s Ronde van Vlaanderen. This one is made even more exciting for me by the fact that I now have some small connection to the Women’s Tibco Racing Team, as I watched with envy as they each pulled their bikes off the oversized baggage carrousel in Schiphol. Classy girls, each of them; they were really having a good time laughing in the giggly kind of way you can only understand if you’ve ever been jet lagged.

Sadly, this gives me no insight whatsoever into who might or might not be within a chance of winning the event, or placing in the top V. But be that as it may, get your VSP picks in by the time the countdown counter drops to zero for a chance to win the Women’s VSP. Winner of this VSP event will earn the right to comment all year with the Leeuw van Vlaanderen commenting badge. We will also forgo the usual Symbol Pack prize awarded to a Monument and award the winner a copy of the local newspaper the day after the race.

Related Posts

212 Replies to “Velominati Super Prestige: Women’s Ronde van Vlaanderen 2012”

  1. @el gato

    Me! I’m a bleedin’ expert now.

    Look at your picks above this box where you post. Click on the little upside down black triangle. You will see the dispute option in red. Click it. The rest you can figure out.

    You now owe me Ten Shillings. I want it in old pennies in a bag…send me a picture of the cash so I know that you’re real. Dan R…you owe me a picture of five quid!

    Sleep deprivation is weird eh? I worked all weekend, slept for two hours this am then did 105K…I feel odd. Elated and altered.

  2. @tomb

    Dispute it proper fashion like…no comments. Frank won’t take diputes in comments form! Follow the steps in my previous post.

  3. @paolo

    Who actually reads this stuff?

    Actually on my iPad the new mobile profile makes it a bit dicky to read the threads well. See it now and disputed correctly.

  4. @paolo
    Thanks for that. Had no idea dispute existed for that reason.
    I thought dispute was for when you state your pick as something stupid like “Squeaky Voiced Tiny Jockey Manchild” meaning Gerrans and the system thinks you meant Evans.

  5. @Blah

    Course you could just simplify the whole process by saing Evans..or Gerrans.

    But next weekend if I were you as my # 1 pick I’d say Hushovd coz if you don’t your gonna be crying in your fosters.

  6. @paolo

    @Blah

    Course you could just simplify the whole process by saing Evans..or Gerrans.

    But next weekend if I were you as my # 1 pick I’d say Hushovd coz if you don’t your gonna be crying in your fosters.

    Geeze if you’re drinking Fosters you’ll likely be crying into it no matter who you pick.

    As for the names – yes, I pretty much just use the names. I have no idea who some people are picking with some of the more esoteric monickers used.

  7. @Blah

    Fosters would never touch my lips. This week use the name Hushovd. I’m tellin yer..It came to me in a dream. Hushovd wins in s sprint finish in the velodrome. I got a considerable bet with Ladbrokes on this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Skip to toolbar