Velominati Super Prestige: Paris-Roubaix 2015

View Comments

• @dyalander

  @Chris

  I don’t think the comparative speed is the most significant factor – a peloton is far more difficult to stop than a car or a group of cars travelling in a line. Far more difficult. If the first rider hits the brakes when he sees the lights flashing there is a real chance that a pile up would ensue and riders would end up on the tracks in a far more dangerous predicament.

  The gates may be similar to those in the UK, but then, they may not be. I couldn’t say. But I would expect that ,they are designed for general traffic not for a peloton in a race.

  For the sake of the discussion I'm going to assume that the timings on the gates are roughly comparable to those in the UK. As you say, the barrier is likely to be designed for general traffic so the general principles and the speeds they expect traffic to be travelling at is going to be similar. In the UK that road is likely to be limited to 50 or 60 mph (80 or 96 kph) for which the braking distance is listed in the highway code as being 53 or 73 m (for 80 kph that's 15 m of reaction time and 38 m of actual braking - assuming the driver reacts immediately once the lights start flashing). The timing between the lights beginning to flash and the barrier dropping is likely to be based on something similar but with a bit more reaction time built in for safety. Either way it is a long way to stop anything.

  Granted, there maybe a pile up if one of the front riders slams the brakes on. However, given the skill levels you'd expect from someone who cycles every day and has most likely developed a severe disliking to falling off, I'd suggest that a more measured approach of signalling a hazard, easing off the power and gradual braking would be possible. I've never ridden in the pro peloton and on the odd occasion when I have raced there wasn't anything other than corners and my own inability to keep pushing the pedals hard enough that caused any sort of slowing down but we generally manage to draw to a halt in an organised manner on Sunday club runs and the like. The speed may not always be as high but neither is the level of bike handling skill.

  @dyalander

  @Chris

  I don’t consider cyclists in an organised race flouting speed limits while descending to be setting a bad example – the road rules don’t apply to racing cyclists. I think this is comparable – they are choosing to flout a road rule (not a race rule – only those that crossed when the gate was down contravened the race rule and they should be dq’d) – they are putting themselves in danger in both instances. I’m fine with both on that respect.

  It isn't comparable at all. In a closed course race, traffic rules are suspended and replaced by race rules on the basis that the roads are empty of traffic.

  No traffic = no requirement for traffic rules.

  Where a race crosses a railway and the train operator(s) haven't agreed to suspend services for the duration, only a moron would suggest that the riders shouldn't take heed of rules relating to crossings.

• I'm genuinely surprised at the brouhaha around this, and also by some of the positions being taken.

  There was good 8 or 9 seconds between the last rider and the train - that's not even close. Compared to doing 100km/h down a wet mountain pass in Italy it doesn't even register on the pro-cycling scale of near-death experiences.

  It's just that this time it gives a load of media and hangers-on a chance to make a story out of something that has never been a problem in all the years it has been happening, was not really a problem this year and is unlikely to ever be a problem in future years despite all the desperate appeals for somebody to "Think of the children".

• @ChrisO

  Compared to doing 100km/h down a wet mountain pass in Italy it doesn’t even register on the pro-cycling scale of near-death experiences.

  Right? I mean, I heard Paul or Phil say something like "he's lucky to be alive," and my eyes rolled.

• Man, it pisses me off when the only time the media/public pay any attention to the stuff I live and love is when a controversy arises. Talk about fair weather fans...

  Cycling - doping or skirting around a train. Otherwise, never in the news. Maybe a bit on Le Tour, that's it. If you don't report on it, don't highlight only the negatives. Fuck off.

  Ice hockey - only makes headlines when there is savage goonery. Or, a goon dies from possible brain trauma-related issues.

  Soccer - every four years the idiots come out with Donovan jerseys and pretend they know something about soccer. And then they starting talking about the need for stupid shit like reviews, how to create more goals, and other assorted nonsense. Soccer is awesome because it is so basic and there aren't that many stats, as opposed to BS baseball.

• @Chris

  @dyalander

  @Chris

  I don’t think the comparative speed is the most significant factor – a peloton is far more difficult to stop than a car or a group of cars travelling in a line. Far more difficult. If the first rider hits the brakes when he sees the lights flashing there is a real chance that a pile up would ensue and riders would end up on the tracks in a far more dangerous predicament.

  The gates may be similar to those in the UK, but then, they may not be. I couldn’t say. But I would expect that ,they are designed for general traffic not for a peloton in a race.

  For the sake of the discussion I’m going to assume that the timings on the gates are roughly comparable to those in the UK. As you say, the barrier is likely to be designed for general traffic so the general principles and the speeds they expect traffic to be travelling at is going to be similar. In the UK that road is likely to be limited to 50 or 60 mph (80 or 96 kph) for which the braking distance is listed in the highway code as being 53 or 73 m (for 80 kph that’s 15 m of reaction time and 38 m of actual braking – assuming the driver reacts immediately once the lights start flashing). The timing between the lights beginning to flash and the barrier dropping is likely to be based on something similar but with a bit more reaction time built in for safety. Either way it is a long way to stop anything.

  Granted, there maybe a pile up if one of the front riders slams the brakes on. However, given the skill levels you’d expect from someone who cycles every day and has most likely developed a severe disliking to falling off, I’d suggest that a more measured approach of signalling a hazard, easing off the power and gradual braking would be possible. I’ve never ridden in the pro peloton and on the odd occasion when I have raced there wasn’t anything other than corners and my own inability to keep pushing the pedals hard enough that caused any sort of slowing down but we generally manage to draw to a halt in an organised manner on Sunday club runs and the like. The speed may not always be as high but neither is the level of bike handling skill.

  @dyalander

  @Chris

  I don’t consider cyclists in an organised race flouting speed limits while descending to be setting a bad example – the road rules don’t apply to racing cyclists. I think this is comparable – they are choosing to flout a road rule (not a race rule – only those that crossed when the gate was down contravened the race rule and they should be dq’d) – they are putting themselves in danger in both instances. I’m fine with both on that respect.

  It isn’t comparable at all. In a closed course race, traffic rules are suspended and replaced by race rules on the basis that the roads are empty of traffic.

  No traffic = no requirement for traffic rules.

  Where a race crosses a railway and the train operator(s) haven’t agreed to suspend services for the duration, only a moron would suggest that the riders shouldn’t take heed of rules relating to crossings.

  How can it be wrong:

• @VirenqueForever

  How can it be wrong:

  OFFS. I give up. It's clearly an off duty railway official helping with a faulty barrier.

• @Chris

  @VirenqueForever

  How can it be wrong:

  OFFS. I give up. It’s clearly an off duty railway official helping with a faulty barrier.

  "Salut mes amis! Je vais vous voir à la velodrome."

• @Chris

  The point where you should have given up was when you realised you were on the same complaining side as (in order of horror):

  • Phil'n'Paul
  • A train company
  • The Daily Mail, and
  • Fabian Cancellara

• @ChrisO

  Even the biggest fuckwits are capable of moments of absolute clarity. They just don't recognise that they're wrong most of the time.

  I'll stand by what I said in the first post. Not because I think what happened was particularly dangerous. You're right there was a clear gap between the last rider and the train (possibly that gap would have been much smaller if the policeman hadn't stopped them). But I think the organisers are in a position where they'll receive criticism, rightly or wrongly, that they have a duty to both prevent such situations and take a hard line on anyone flouting the rules. My main problem with the whole thing is their assertion that they were blameless. They could have done more. In general though, I'm pissed off with people, either deliberately or inadvertently, getting in the way of trains. I seem to be spending too much time stuck on trains going nowhere or waiting for trains that aren't going to turn up.

• @ChrisO

  I’m genuinely surprised at the brouhaha around this, and also by some of the positions being taken.

  There was good 8 or 9 seconds between the last rider and the train – that’s not even close. Compared to doing 100km/h down a wet mountain pass in Italy it doesn’t even register on the pro-cycling scale of near-death experiences.

  It’s just that this time it gives a load of media and hangers-on a chance to make a story out of something that has never been a problem in all the years it has been happening, was not really a problem this year and is unlikely to ever be a problem in future years despite all the desperate appeals for somebody to “Think of the children”.

  Hear hear! The voice of reason...