Velominati Super Prestige

The Velominati Super Prestige is a season-long competition wherein readers will be submitting their predictions for the top five finishers of each qualifying race.  In order to qualify, your picks via the VSP Picks form above the posts section of the VSP Event article pertaining to the race in question by the time the countdown clock goes to zero at midnight on the day of the race start. These articles are clearly marked and are generally posted at least 72 hours in advance of each event. The current leader of the competition has the honor of posting on the site bearing the VSP Leader’s badge; winners of select races (the monuments and Grand Tours) similarly gain the honor of posting with a dedicated badge for the remainder of the year. Prizes may be given for key events; these prizes will be announced on the associated VSP Event. Points will be tallied as the season progresses and the winner will be announced after Paris-Tours. Prizes to be determined.

Scoring (One-Day Races)

Readers who wish to enter shall enter their predictions for the top five placings of each race by the time the countdown clock goes to zero at midnight PDT on the day of the race. Regular Points Points will be scored in reverse order of finishing order: 7 points for first place, 5 points for second, 4 for third, 3 for fourth, and 2 for fifth.  Readers will also earn 1 bonus point for every other rider named in the top five, regardless of the rider’s placing, but riders are not scored twice. Tie Breaking In the event of a tie, the first reader to submit their predictions will be named the winner.

Scoring (Grand Tours)

Readers who wish to enter shall enter their predictions for the top five placings on General Classification of each Grand Tour by the time the countdown clock goes to zero at midnight PDT on the day of the first stage or prologue. Points Points will be scored as follows based on the final G.C of the race: 20 points for first place, 15 for second, 10 for third, 7 for fourth, and 5 for fifth; plus 3 points per rider in the top five regardless of the rider’s placing, but riders are not scored twice. Changing of the Picks* Contestants are allowed to make line up changes on one of the rest days of the Grand Tours but not both. These changes will come with a point penalty.  You will be allotted one (1) rest day to make swaps in grand tours; you may pick either the first or second rest day. The penalties for swapping will be lower for the first rest day than the second. This will allow you to swap out a rider(s) who gets caught in some first week nervousness  with a 5 point penalty for each swap. Or make some go for broke/doomed to fail break-away swap on the second rest day for a 10 point penalty for each swap. That’s it. You make one swap or five on either rest day for the corresponding 5 or 10 point penalty per swap. Additionally, if one of your riders crashes out, DNF’s, or DNS’s, you may swap them out on a rest day with corresponding penalties if you haven’t already used up your one rest day swap. Tie Breaking In the event of a tie, the first reader to submit their predictions will be named the winner. Minor Stages We will be posting VSP’s for minor stages as well. Scoring is similar to one-day racing, except no bonus points are in play for getting the rider in the wrong placing.

Scoring (Minor Stage Races)

Readers who wish to enter shall enter their predictions for the top five placings on General Classification of each Minor Stage Race (less than three weeks) by the time the countdown clock goes to zero at midnight PDT on the day of the first stage or prologue. Regular Points Points will be scored in reverse order of finishing order: 10 points for first place, 8 for second, 7 for third, 5 for fourth, and 3 for fifth; plus two bonus points per rider in the top five regardless of the rider’s placing, but riders are not scored twice. Tie Breaking In the event of a tie, the first reader to submit their predictions will be named the winner.

Posting Badges

The following badges will be worn by current leaders of the competition and sub-competitions:

Overall Super Prestige Leader:
Milano Sanremo:
VVomen’s Ronde van Vlaanderen:
Men’s Ronde van Vlaanderen:
Paris-Roubaix:
Leige-Bastogne-Liege:
Giro d’Italia Leader:
Giro Rosa Leader:
Tour de France Leader:
Vuelta a Espana Leader:
Giro di Lombardia:
Overal Super Prestige Lanterne Rouge:

2016 Velominati Super Prestige Schedule

Les Hommes

Start

End

Event

Race Website

18.03.2017 18.03.2017 Milano-Sanremo www.milanosanremo.it
26.03.2017 26.03.2017 Gent-Wevelgem in Flanders Fields www.gent-wevelgem.be
02.04.2017 02.04.2017 Ronde van Vlaanderen – Tour des Flandres www.flandersclassics.be
09.04.2017 09.04.2017 Paris-Roubaix www.letour.fr
16.04.2017 16.04.2017 Amstel Gold Race www.amstelgoldrace.nl
19.04.2017 19.04.2017 La Flèche Wallonne www.letour.fr
23.04.2017 23.04.2017 Liège-Bastogne-Liège www.letour.fr
05.05.2017 28.05.2017 Giro d’Italia www.giroditalia.it
04.06.2017 11.06.2017 Critérium du Dauphiné www.letour.fr
10.06.2017 18.06.2017 Tour de Suisse www.tds.ch
01.07.2017 23.07.2017 Tour de France www.letour.fr
29.07.2017 29.07.2017 Clasica Ciclista San Sebastian www.klasikoa.net
19.08.2017 10.09.2017 La Vuelta ciclista a España lavuelta.com
08.09.2017 08.09.2017 Grand Prix Cycliste de Québec www.gpcqm.ca
10.09.2017 10.09.2017 Grand Prix Cycliste de Montréal www.gpcqm.ca
20.09.2017 20.09.2017 Mens World Championship Time Trial
24.09.2017 24.09.2017 Mens World Championship Road Race
07.10.2017 07.10.2017 Il Lombardia www.illombardia.it

La Femmes

Start

End

Event

Race Website

26.03.2017 26.03.2017 Gent-Wevelgem In Flanders Fields www.gent-wevelgem.be
02.04.2017 02.04.2017 Ronde van Vlaanderen / Tour des Flandres www.flandersclassics.be
16.04.2017 16.04.2017 Amstel Gold Race [email protected]
19.04.2017 19.04.2017 La Flèche Wallonne Féminine www.letour.fr
23.04.2017 23.04.2017 Liège-Bastogne-Liège Femmes www.letour.fr  et www.pesantliege.be
11.05.2017 14.05.2017 Amgen Breakaway from Heart Disease Women’s Race empowered with SRAM amgentourofcalifornia.com
30.06.2017 09.07.2017 Giro d’Italia Internazionale Femminile
20.07.2017 20.07.2017 La Course by Le Tour de France www.letour.fr
29.07.2017 29.07.2017 Prudential RideLondon Classique www.ridelondon.co.uk/events/classique
17.08.2017 20.08.2017 Ladies Tour of Norway www.ladiestour.no
26.08.2017 26.08.2017 GP de Plouay – Lorient Agglomération www.grandprix-plouay.com
29.08.2017 03.09.2017 Boels Rental Ladies Tour www.hollandladiestour.nl
10.09.2017 10.09.2017 Madrid Challenge by la Vuelta lavuelta.com/Madridchallenge
19.09.2017 19.09.2017 Womens World Championship Time Trial
23.09.2017 23.09.2017 Womens World Championship Road Race

Standings

[vsp_gc year=”2017″/]

Past Results

[vsp_gc year=”2016″/]

 

[vsp_gc year=”2015″/]

 

[vsp_gc year=”2014″/]

 

[vsp_gc year=”2013″/]

 

[vsp_gc year=”2012″/]

 

[vsp_gc year=”2011″/]

2010 VSP G.C.

1. Andy 56 points
2. Geoff 53 points
3. Steampunk: 51 points
4. Frank 48 points
5. Gianni 47 points
6. Marcus: 43 points
7. Jarvis 42 points
8. Hawkeye 40 points
9. Rob 38 points
10. Brett 37 point
11. Robert Marques: 36 point
12. Joe 35 point
13. Marko 32 points
14. Scott 26 points
15. Roadslave 25 points
16. Ben 21 points
17. Ken 17 points
18. Pont 15 points
19. Nathan Edwards: 11 points
20. Souleur: 10 points
21. Crossy: 10 points
22. KitCarson 10 points
23. Mr Haven 7 points
24. Cyclops 6 points
25. Daniel 5 points
26. Sgt 3 points
27. David: 2 points
29. Dan O 2 points
30. Joshua 2 points
31. David 1 points
32. James 0 points
33. Jim 0 points
34. Ben: 0 points
35. Dale: 0 points
36. Houdini 0 points

*The Changing of the Picks rules are designed to promote fair play and keep the competition fun and open throughout the three-week race.  Abuse of these rules will be managed through the “Piti Principle”: if we we feel you are attempting to exploit loopholes or otherwise take advantage of the Changing of the Picks rules, we will penalize you by deducting points from your total score. Much like the UCI doping suspensions, the amount of points deducted will be based on how egregious the abuse was.

2,331 Replies to “Velominati Super Prestige”

  1. @Rick

    @wiscot

    Oh, and one more thing. I get Gaviria being relegated yesterday, but Greipel? He held his line. There was no gap (deliberately by AG, he knows what he was doing) yet Gaviria tries to come through a gap that’s not there and starts headbutting AG. Bad call by commissaires.

    0

    Greipel’s foul was earlier but he seemed to be in the right on that one too.

    0

    Yeah I saw that. Looked unnecessary for AG to use his head as the road was wide and there was lots of room. Gaviria just wanted to go through a non-existent gap.

    Happy for Degenkolb. We have on of his Trek bikes on view at my work. Hopefully the monkey’s off his back now.

  2. @wiscot

    @Rick

    @wiscot

    Oh, and one more thing. I get Gaviria being relegated yesterday, but Greipel? He held his line. There was no gap (deliberately by AG, he knows what he was doing) yet Gaviria tries to come through a gap that’s not there and starts headbutting AG. Bad call by commissaires.

    0

    Greipel’s foul was earlier but he seemed to be in the right on that one too.

    0

    Yeah I saw that. Looked unnecessary for AG to use his head as the road was wide and there was lots of room. Gaviria just wanted to go through a non-existent gap.

    Happy for Degenkolb. We have on of his Trek bikes on view at my work. Hopefully the monkey’s off his back now.

    0

    It looked to me as if Greipel was simply protecting his position. I don’t think he even hit the other rider with his head. That was essentially a make up call for correctly relegating Gaviria.

    Hard not to be happy for Degenkolb after all he has been through. Chapeau!

  3. @chris

    @Teocalli

    Thanks. Not that it helps. I think I’ve really fucked this one up. Not that I’ll be too upset if Thomas wins it.

    0

    I dunno – a whole bunch of us had Porte second, so you have not lost so much there.

  4. @Teocalli

    @chris

    @Teocalli

    Thanks. Not that it helps. I think I’ve really fucked this one up. Not that I’ll be too upset if Thomas wins it.

    0

    I dunno – a whole bunch of us had Porte second, so you have not lost so much there.

    0

    True but I’ve also got Uran and haven’t got Thomas.

  5. @Teocalli

    @KogaLover

    Porte out, starboard home

    Which of course is where Posh came from.

    Sadly untrue. Seems like it’s a backronym.

    A popular folk etymology holds that the term is an acronym for “port out, starboard home”, describing the cooler, north-facing cabins taken by the most aristocratic or rich passengers travelling from Britain to India and back. However, there is no evidence for this claim. [citation]

  6. On the subject of Porte crashing out, did anyone hear the Cycling Podcast interview(s) with Matt White of Mitchelton Scott? I’ve often liked his interviews in the past, but yikes was he being a right whiny sourpuss about the cobbles! “Cobbles belong in April” etc. etc.

    My main issue is that he maintained this bullshit after the stage as well, as if all the GC contenders had crashed out and the entire race to come was just a farse. This despite Yates being absolutely fine. He seemed to miss the part where the only GC rider who quit was Porte (on asphalt, not pavé), and the only GC rider who came to any grief on the pavé was Froome, who got straight up again (Uran and Landa both crashed on asphalt AFAIK). Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    The way I interpret the concept of “General Classification” is that it is awarded to the strongest all-round rider. Moaning that the more climby riders will struggle on pavé is IMO equivalent to complaining that TT riders will struggle on mountain stages. It’s like, “yes… that’s why there’s a mountains classification.”

    Anyway, it just really annoyed me. /rant

  7. @mulebeatsdrums

    On the subject of Porte crashing out, did anyone hear the Cycling Podcast interview(s) with Matt White of Mitchelton Scott? I’ve often liked his interviews in the past, but yikes was he being a right whiny sourpuss about the cobbles! “Cobbles belong in April” etc. etc.

    My main issue is that he maintained this bullshit after the stage as well, as if all the GC contenders had crashed out and the entire race to come was just a farse. This despite Yates being absolutely fine. He seemed to miss the part where the only GC rider who quit was Porte (on asphalt, not pavé), and the only GC rider who came to any grief on the pavé was Froome, who got straight up again (Uran and Landa both crashed on asphalt AFAIK). Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    The way I interpret the concept of “General Classification” is that it is awarded to the strongest all-round rider. Moaning that the more climby riders will struggle on pavé is IMO equivalent to complaining that TT riders will struggle on mountain stages. It’s like, “yes… that’s why there’s a mountains classification.”

    Anyway, it just really annoyed me. /rant

    0

    The “climbiest” rider of all the GC contenders seemed to do just fine on the pave, thank you very much.

  8. @Rick

    @mulebeatsdrums

    On the subject of Porte crashing out, did anyone hear the Cycling Podcast interview(s) with Matt White of Mitchelton Scott? I’ve often liked his interviews in the past, but yikes was he being a right whiny sourpuss about the cobbles! “Cobbles belong in April” etc. etc.

    My main issue is that he maintained this bullshit after the stage as well, as if all the GC contenders had crashed out and the entire race to come was just a farse. This despite Yates being absolutely fine. He seemed to miss the part where the only GC rider who quit was Porte (on asphalt, not pavé), and the only GC rider who came to any grief on the pavé was Froome, who got straight up again (Uran and Landa both crashed on asphalt AFAIK). Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    The way I interpret the concept of “General Classification” is that it is awarded to the strongest all-round rider. Moaning that the more climby riders will struggle on pavé is IMO equivalent to complaining that TT riders will struggle on mountain stages. It’s like, “yes… that’s why there’s a mountains classification.”

    Anyway, it just really annoyed me. /rant

    0

    The “climbiest” rider of all the GC contenders seemed to do just fine on the pave, thank you very much.

    0

    Dan Martin said he loved it!

  9. @mulebeatsdrums

     

    Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

     

    0

    Anyone else see the rumour that some well placed and time motorbike assistance helped AG2R get Bardet back up to the GC group after his 4th puncture? It seems to me like he made up a LOT of time and there is absolutely no footage of the chase at all, which seems strange for the French favourite…

  10. @RobSandy

    @mulebeatsdrums

    Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    0

    Anyone else see the rumour that some well placed and time motorbike assistance helped AG2R get Bardet back up to the GC group after his 4th puncture? It seems to me like he made up a LOT of time and there is absolutely no footage of the chase at all, which seems strange for the French favourite…

    0

    Moscon was saying that he could not understand how some of the gaps were closed when Sky had split the peloton.  Having said that one split I saw closed up did not have any cars in between and was closed on a road section.  If I remember correctly that was by Movistar driving the group back from a fairly significant split.

  11. Well, La Course is starting in literally minutes, so I’m guessing the VSP has Delgadoed. Getting my picks in under the wire, just in case:

    1. Van Vleuten
    2. Moolman-Pasio
    3. Van Der Breggen
    4. Spratt
    5. Guarnier.
  12. @RobSandy

    @mulebeatsdrums

    Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    Anyone else see the rumour that some well placed and time motorbike assistance helped AG2R get Bardet back up to the GC group after his 4th puncture? It seems to me like he made up a LOT of time and there is absolutely no footage of the chase at all, which seems strange for the French favourite…

    I did hear that, specifically from Matt White again, saying that “you can’t have the TV pictures taking priority over the bike race” (I don’t want to tell him that sport is in the entertainment industry, so you kinda do need the TV pictures…). But if it was the TV motos, then it seems odd that we didn’t see any footage. Je ne sais pas.

  13. @Teocalli

    @RobSandy

    @mulebeatsdrums

    Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    0

    Anyone else see the rumour that some well placed and time motorbike assistance helped AG2R get Bardet back up to the GC group after his 4th puncture? It seems to me like he made up a LOT of time and there is absolutely no footage of the chase at all, which seems strange for the French favourite…

    0

    Moscon was saying that he could not understand how some of the gaps were closed when Sky had split the peloton. Having said that one split I saw closed up did not have any cars in between and was closed on a road section. If I remember correctly that was by Movistar driving the group back from a fairly significant split.

    0

    I know Movistar did a strong pull to get Landa back on – and I think Bardet got onto that group, but there was still a decent (1:30 ish) gap which came down to 7 seconds within 20 kms or something.

    Maybe they just worked hard but it seems a bit fishy.

  14. @mulebeatsdrums

    Well, La Course is starting in literally minutes, so I’m guessing the VSP has Delgadoed. Getting my picks in under the wire, just in case:

    1. Van Vleuten
    2. Moolman-Pasio
    3. Van Der Breggen
    4. Spratt
    5. Guarnier.
    0

    Ah balls.  Sorry folks we’ll have to scratch this one.

  15. @Teocalli

    No worries mate. The “Official” VSP missed races in the past as well.

    It’s a pity, because the way it’s looking at the moment, I think my top picks would’ve been rather good XD

  16. @RobSandy

    @Teocalli

    @RobSandy

    @mulebeatsdrums

    Bardet had his punctures, obviously, but if he hadn’t, he could’ve gained time he was riding so well.

    0

    Anyone else see the rumour that some well placed and time motorbike assistance helped AG2R get Bardet back up to the GC group after his 4th puncture? It seems to me like he made up a LOT of time and there is absolutely no footage of the chase at all, which seems strange for the French favourite…

    0

    Moscon was saying that he could not understand how some of the gaps were closed when Sky had split the peloton. Having said that one split I saw closed up did not have any cars in between and was closed on a road section. If I remember correctly that was by Movistar driving the group back from a fairly significant split.

    0

    I know Movistar did a strong pull to get Landa back on – and I think Bardet got onto that group, but there was still a decent (1:30 ish) gap which came down to 7 seconds within 20 kms or something.

    Maybe they just worked hard but it seems a bit fishy.

    0

    Toms Skujins isn’t happy with Landa and Bardet’s motorpacing antics

    After sector four [of the cobbles] I was caught by the group with Movistar chasing. Mikel Landa was there and then later on, Romain Bardet. We definitely had some situations when the cars shouldn’t have been there.

    First of all it was dangerous. But there were a couple of times when I thought we were going suddenly a little bit too fast – we were doing 55-plus kilometres an hour on flat, maybe slightly uphill roads, and then looking up you see the motorbike.”

    You can’t blame the riders for using the motos. We use every single advantage you can get on the road. But it would be great to have the motos maybe stay a little further away.

  17. @chris

    Toms Skujins isn’t happy with Landa and Bardet’s motorpacing antics

    After sector four [of the cobbles] I was caught by the group with Movistar chasing. Mikel Landa was there and then later on, Romain Bardet. We definitely had some situations when the cars shouldn’t have been there.

    First of all it was dangerous. But there were a couple of times when I thought we were going suddenly a little bit too fast – we were doing 55-plus kilometres an hour on flat, maybe slightly uphill roads, and then looking up you see the motorbike.”

    You can’t blame the riders for using the motos. We use every single advantage you can get on the road. But it would be great to have the motos maybe stay a little further away.

    0

    How strange the French tv cameras didn’t film that bit.

  18. @RobSandy

    You mean the French TV crews on motos piloted Frenchmen? Strikes me as somewhat incompetent, non?

    Euh, c’était très poussiéreux sur les routes pavées et j’ai dû nettoyer mon objectif de la caméra? Oui c’est ça.

  19. @chris

    Toms Skujins isn’t happy with Landa and Bardet’s motorpacing antics

    After sector four [of the cobbles] I was caught by the group with Movistar chasing. Mikel Landa was there and then later on, Romain Bardet. We definitely had some situations when the cars shouldn’t have been there.

    First of all it was dangerous. But there were a couple of times when I thought we were going suddenly a little bit too fast – we were doing 55-plus kilometres an hour on flat, maybe slightly uphill roads, and then looking up you see the motorbike.”

    You can’t blame the riders for using the motos. We use every single advantage you can get on the road. But it would be great to have the motos maybe stay a little further away.

    Yeah, I think the Cycling Podcast said something about the “barraging” not happening properly. I think there was a conflict where the motos couldn’t move further up because there were team cars in the way, and removing the team cars would have impeded the riders, and if there had been a mechanical in the front group, the cars would be held up and the same GC riders complaining about Landa and Bardet drafting would complain about delays. I think that’s what was being said, anyway.

    @chris

    Euh, c’était très poussiéreux sur les routes pavées et j’ai dû nettoyer mon objectif de la caméra? Oui c’est ça.

    This made me laugh SO much.

  20. @Teocalli

    My “quote” button isn’t working, but regarding the Giro Rosa scoring, several of our competitors didn’t spell “Guarnier” correctly. I double checked all the scores and come up with the same results as your last update.

  21. @MangoDave

    @Teocalli

    My “quote” button isn’t working, but regarding the Giro Rosa scoring, several of our competitors didn’t spell “Guarnier” correctly. I double checked all the scores and come up with the same results as your last update.

    0

    Yeah I spotted everyone’s typos (I think) and then made a new one of my own on @Rick!  Thanks for keeping a check.

  22. Second ride with my son today. Too early for #33 but he remembered #37 and i helped him to understand #41. Progress!!!

  23. @KogaLover

    Second ride with my son today. Too early for #33 but he remembered #37 and i helped him to understand #41. Progress!!!

    0

    Well done! Regarding Rule #41, I know a lady who was riding in a pace line behind someone who was not Rule #41 compliant. She overlapped his rear wheel and the misplaced skewer lever sheered her spokes from her front wheel. She hit the deck very hard and wound up in traction. The heeling process was long and arduous as it involved pins to reset her shattered elbow.

    These rules are not just for show, they are often safety issues. One of my pet peeves is the glasses inside the helmet straps crowd who laugh at those of us who insist on being Rule #37 compliant. Should I do a face-plant onto the tarmac, I want my glasses as far away from my eyes as possible. I wouldn’t want them held in place by my helmet straps.

  24. @Rick

    Our local group ride is pretty strict on Rule #41 compliance, particularly with rear QRs pointing backwards that could be opened up if someone rides into the back.

  25. Balanced reporting from CN at last, they’re having a go at a a rider who isn’t part of Team Sky…

    We now know that the rider caught up in the Operacion Puerto doping scandal is not a team leader at Movistar.

  26. It should be interesting around the Sky dinner table tonight:

     

    Chris Froome spoke briefly post stage. He confirmed that Thomas’ attack was not part of the pre-race plan.

     

    “It’s an amazing position for us, I don’t think we quite expected that going into today’s stage. I think initially everybody thought Alpe d’Huez would be the more decisive and it very well still could be. It puts us in a fantastic position going into tomorrow’s stage,” Froome told Eurosport.

     

    “I think it was a spur of the moment thing but it made sense, it was perfect. We didn’t even have to talk, it was the right thing for G to do and push on there. I let the wheel go because I knew it would put the onus on the rest of the guys to chase.”

    Source: Cycling News

  27. @Rick

    It should be interesting around the Sky dinner table tonight:

    Chris Froome spoke briefly post stage. He confirmed that Thomas’ attack was not part of the pre-race plan.

     

    “It’s an amazing position for us, I don’t think we quite expected that going into today’s stage. I think initially everybody thought Alpe d’Huez would be the more decisive and it very well still could be. It puts us in a fantastic position going into tomorrow’s stage,” Froome told Eurosport.

     

    “I think it was a spur of the moment thing but it made sense, it was perfect. We didn’t even have to talk, it was the right thing for G to do and push on there. I let the wheel go because I knew it would put the onus on the rest of the guys to chase.”

    Source: Cycling News

    0

    Very true. Will Froome attack a teammate? Will GT have a “bad” day? Froome wants to join the “Famous 5” club but may have to shaft a teammate to get there. GT looked pretty aggressive with his victory salute today.

    Tommy D looks like he’s here on business and I’d say Nibbles is looking very dangerous. He’s right up there and looks like he’s biding his time. Bardet has to go for it soon or he’ll be too far behind. Sad/bad day for Cav. Just didn’t have it this year. Merckx’s record is same for a long time to come I think.

  28. @Teocalli

    Uran pulls out.

    0

    Looks like a few have picked him.

    Before the Tour started I very nearly took Tom D out and put Yates in. Goes to show I occasionally make good decisions.

    I’m liking Dumoulin more and more. He’s a hell of a gutsy racer. Chapeau to him for not letting Sky dictate his race and I’m glad he got something from his attack.

  29. Kruijswijk / LottoNL Jumbo taking a leaf out of the Froome / Sky Giro book today?  This could liven things up!

    Sprinters getting thin on the ground with Gaviria, Groenewegen and Griepel out.

  30. Massacre of sprinters, Sagan could win in Paris after all & some more stages too.

  31. Bernal edging the GC group back on Kruijswijk.  As usual Valverde makes little sense, goes with the breakaway and then can’t help Landa/Quintana when the GC leaders catch him.  At some point the GC group are going to have to for it.\

    Dan Martin being dropped.

  32. Landa stepping up to be Movistar leader as Quintana gets dropped?

    Did that chap take a swing at Froome’s head?  Looked a bit odd but might just have been camera angle and foreshortening.

  33. Pretty much down to GC mano a mano as Bernal peals off…….can Kruijswijk hang on……..Froome attacks and do we have a moto incident taking out Nibili…….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.