While we generally try to space out our guest pieces by a few weeks at least, we simply couldn’t resist the temptation to chuck this one up right on the heels of Oli Brooke-White’s post on Spinaci’s. After all, this is probably the second time in the Velominati’s history that a direct reference has been made to this relic of cycling’s past; it would be foolish to let another year go by as we wait for better timing.
The Spinacis hail from a time when experimentation was rife in cycling (both in equipment and, shall we say, performance improvement methods) as funnybikes, handlebar attachments, and electronic shifting all graced the peloton as riders sought to find the maximum advantage. Sit back and enjoy as Jarvis returns to take us through his account of this iconic piece of kit.
Yours in Cycling,
Frank
—
Harking back to the days when the UCI banned equipment for a good reason, the Spinaci was a piece of equipment that possibly troubled the Velominatus of the day on both personal style and how they affected the aesthetic properties of the bike. I say possibly because I never owned any, financial implications meant it was more important to ensure I had matching tyres.
For the rider, the Spinaci allowed, if set properly, an elegantly elongated position similar to that of the tri-bar but allowing a degree more comfort for those longer days in the saddle. However, get the position wrong and you could look like you were trying to lick your front wheel.
Aesthetically there were similar issues: although additional equipment in general spoils the lines of a road bike and so is frowned upon by the Velominati, get the position of the Spinaci right and you could actually enhance the bike. The ideal position was to have the clamps at 45 degrees and the bars parallel to the ground, although a degree or two to the vertical was acceptable. Mostly though, people set them up in one of three other ways: the aforementioned “wheel-licker”, in the mistaken belief that just because you below the horizontal you were somehow more aerodynamic; those who used them as a poor-mans tri-bar (they just weren’t long enough for that), and finally there were those who angled them up in front of their face, thus assuming the areodynamics of a brick. These people also tended to use them to hang all sorts of additional bar accessories on as well as their shopping. Latterly these people have adopted tri-bars for the same purpose.
That said, the desire for the aero advantage and comfort provided by these bar extensions meant they were effectively the Lay-Z Boy of the handlebar world. You could prop your entire body weight on your forearms in a youthful slump rather than actually making your muscles do some work. Previously any attempt to be aero while riding the opposition off your rear wheel was a case of holding the tops of your bars as close to the stem as possible and hoping your upper arms didn’t cramp up.
If you ever raced through that era, being in a bunch with riders using Spinaci’s was one of the scariest things you’ll ever have done and the best excuse to get off the front of the race, or simply off your bike. This is why they disappeared – the timeline on Cinelli’s website indicates their brief but bright life lasted from 1993 until they were banned from competition by the UCI at the end of 1997. There is a good reason they don’t allow tri-bars in bunch racing and that’s because you have the reaction time and control of an elephant on a tightrope and it was the same with Spinaci’s. I remember one time when I was near the front of a bunch and took a look over my shoulder at that moment a rider on Spinacis touched a wheel and I saw him spear across the road on his face taking out half the bunch.
The same era of the mid-90’s saw combined shifters and brakes becoming widespread in the Peloton and although only applicable for those running Shimano, if you didn’t have Spinaci’s, you could use your gear cables as pretend aero bars. The control was as good, if not better than the Spinaci – if you pulled the cable in the right direction you might even manage to get some sembelence of braking.
The Spinaci showed me the way though; I adopted the “Ghost Spinaci” position, gripped my STI cables lightly and did my best to ride the opposition off my rear wheel.
I know as well as any of you that I've been checked out lately, kind…
Peter Sagan has undergone quite the transformation over the years; starting as a brash and…
The Women's road race has to be my favorite one-day road race after Paris-Roubaix and…
Holy fuckballs. I've never been this late ever on a VSP. I mean, I've missed…
This week we are currently in is the most boring week of the year. After…
I have memories of my life before Cycling, but as the years wear slowly on…
View Comments
While I will agree that anything related to triathlons does not belong in what we know as the sport of cycling (see Rule 42), I have to say that drafting (a nicer name for wheelsucking?) is firmly a part of the sport, professional and amateur alike. Also, in group and individual time trials, bars are of course allowed. But that is the ONLY time they should be employed by a road rider.
During a road race, there is nothing like seeing a group of guys working together for a bit (despite being on separate teams), only to then watch them try to bury each other into the ground as they try and shake their opponents off.
Also, there is the job of the domestique to help teammates get into position for sprints, work their way up the field, and other tasks, utilizing the power of drafting.
Drafting is fine - you just need to not be dumb about it and not employ the use of devices (like aero bars) in situations where they are not appropriate, such as as standard paceline.
great post up Jarvis.
You bring up a memory of mine that I have long forgotten, the old Spinaci's. Everyone had them, and within a year, nearly everyone threw them away, that is who observed the 'unspoken' Rules. That was one of the first observed Rules I abided by, and one that for me at my time was one that identified me as a rider, not a sucker like the ones trying to ride w/them.
@mcsqueak: There is a duality to your point which I appreciate. If I may discuss the flip side of what your observing as well which you imply to some extent here. Indeed there is a poetic beauty observed in the pack, or even more poignant in the Team time trial TTT, as they all equally share a load, in form, in sequential tandem...it is near perfection on 2 wheels. However, I need to return to earth every now and again and remind myself of reality. I am not PRO and I have no domestique and I don't play as one in the pack either. In any given club ride or even in any given race we really are individuals at this level and need to observe Rule V over all others. That means I should try not to draft, not to milk the powers of others, rather, expose them and perhaps expose myself by riding harder. So, ride on the front, set pace, work, observe Rule V and draft a little.
The sport of cycling is interesting in so many ways, one which we find here, working less to perform more. It seems quite counterintuitive. Why don't we work harder expecting perform more, thus we here in the Velomantus do in observance of Rule V. Yet for those outside of this circle, it is the norm and thus we have problems of dope in PRO circles, we have weight weenies and crazy things of the like.
Do we draft, do we appreciate the work in the breakaway, yes without a doubt, but there is a degree of hardness evidenced in that which makes it so admirable.
I have a box of bike parts and at the bottom are my Spinaci bars. Don't know why I still have them, but I do. They were not as comfortable as my carbon wing bar tops with my hands draped over the bars. That's half the beauty for the wing shape. It assumes the position of prerace slouch per Rule 80 while laying down the V.
@Souleur
Agreed. I'm sure some of this site are racers of various categories and accomplishments; however I am not one of them. I'm just a guy who likes cycling much more than any of his friends seem to.
It's a funny thing about cycling, in that there is a romanticism around the suffering, hard work, and the besting of personal goals for the type of cyclist that reads this site. You certainly won't get the same answer from someone who is a "summer bike path rider".
I also agree that the pros have a whole different game to play than those of us who just tool around town and do some group rides. At the same time, some of the longest and hardest rides I have ever done have been with one or more other cyclists, where we worked together to achieve our shared goal. I certainly don't think there is anything wrong with that, as long as you are challenging yourself enough to grow as a cyclist. The person who skips riding hills and just hangs out on the end of a paceline during group rides is never going to grow.
You need to carefully balance all of these things to become a better cyclist in my opinion. But that is getting WAY off topic...
SPINACIS + BARBONE = SPINACILINGUS
Nice one Jarvis; but where the hell are you? Come back mate, we miss your insights.
There was a set of Spinacis on TradeMe recently, and I was oh so tempted to buy those suckers and mount them on the Bozzie, just for shits and giggles. If they weren't red, and the drilled version, they might just be in my possession now. Kinda glad they're not.
@SupermanSam
All
If you want to read an article about an Aussie hardman written by Superman Sam, go over to Cyclingtips.
http://www.cyclingtipsblog.com/2010/11/where-are-they-now-don-allan/#comments
You will also hear how Mr Superman got to dine with someone fairly special.
@Marcus
Yeah, read that this morning, highly recommended.
@Marcus
Cheers Marcus. Thanks.
For a funny sideline, check out this interview with the Aussie hard man of the track Danny Clark - http://www.pezcyclingnews.com/?pg=fullstory&id=7999
Don Allan is the other rider with Danny (Southern Cross stars on jersey).
Danny won the second highest number of 6 day races, in later races after he got off his bike after racing (8pm - 2am each night) he sang out front in the band in the middle of the track. He also rode for a team sponsored by a Danish stick mag (p@rn mag), which went well with the 'mo. Surely he gets a free pass for violation of Rule 50 because he looked like he could have starred in the mag..?
I have it on good authority that well into his late '40's (48 I think) he was still laying down the hurt in the Australian national champs. The winner in '94 told me Danny went off the front for 2-3 laps, leaving the young O'Grady, etc. chewing their bars.
PS. Superman Sam is my 4 year old's nickname, no self-promotion from me mate. Especially in the presence of someone Eddy Merckx calls 'mate'.
@SupermanSam
That was a great read 'Sam', I'd never heard of Mr Allan, but he's definitely worthy of Aussie Hardman status. As for Danny Clark, well he needs no introduction to me, and I'm sure our International readers know of his pedigree. Rule 50 would've ran away cowering from the porn pushing vocalist in pure fear and awe.